IELTS Academic Writing — Full Practice Test 2

The bar chart shows the number of visitors, in millions, to four types of tourist attraction — museums, theme parks, historic sites and zoos — in a European country in 2010 and 2020.

Overall, visitor numbers went up at three of the four attractions between the two years, with only historic sites seeing a fall. Theme parks experienced the largest rise, while museums became the most visited attraction by 2020.

In 2010, historic sites were the most popular, with 25 million visitors, followed by museums with 15 million, zoos with 12 million and theme parks with only 8 million. By 2020, museums had risen to 22 million and taken first place, while historic sites had dropped to 19 million. Theme parks more than doubled to 17 million, the biggest increase of all, whereas zoos changed very little, rising slightly from 12 to 13 million.

The bar chart illustrates how many people, in millions, visited four kinds of tourist attraction in a European country in 2010 and 2020.

Overall, most attractions attracted more visitors in 2020 than in 2010, although historic sites were an exception. The greatest growth occurred at theme parks.

In 2010, historic sites received the most visitors at 25 million, well ahead of museums (15 million), zoos (12 million) and theme parks (8 million). Ten years later, the situation had changed. Museums increased to 22 million and became the most visited, whereas historic sites fell to 19 million. Theme parks rose sharply from 8 to 17 million, and zoos increased only slightly to 13 million.

The bar chart shows the number of visitors in millions to four types of tourist attraction in a European country in 2010 and 2020.

Overall, most of the attractions had more visitors in 2020, but historic sites had fewer.

In 2010, historic sites were the most popular with 25 million visitors. Museums had 15 million, zoos had 12 million and theme parks had only 8 million. In 2020, museums increased to 22 million and became the highest. Historic sites decreased to 19 million. Theme parks increased a lot to 17 million and zoos increased a little to 13 million. So we can see that theme parks had the biggest change.

This bar chart is about the visitors of four tourist attraction in a European country. It show the year 2010 and 2020.

In 2010 the historic sites is the most popular, it have 25 million. The museums have 15, zoos 12 and theme parks only 8 million. In 2020 many attraction is increase. The museums become 22 million and it is the most now. But historic sites is decrease to 19 million. Theme parks increase to 17 million and zoos is almost same 13 million. So theme parks and museums is more popular but historic sites is going down.

It is sometimes suggested that unpaid community work should be a compulsory element of secondary schooling. I largely agree with this idea, since it benefits both the students and the wider community.

The main advantage lies in the development of the students themselves. When teenagers volunteer — whether by helping at a care home, cleaning a local park or coaching younger children — they gain practical skills and a sense of responsibility that classroom lessons cannot easily provide. Such experiences also make young people more employable, as universities and employers value candidates who have shown commitment to others.

There are also benefits for society. Many charities and community projects are short of helpers, and a regular supply of student volunteers enables them to achieve far more. Furthermore, making the activity compulsory ensures that every student takes part, not only those who are already community-minded. Although some argue that compulsion removes the genuine spirit of volunteering, I believe the positive habits formed usually remain long after school ends.

In conclusion, I firmly agree that community service should be a required part of the school programme, as it produces more capable young people while supporting the community.

Some people believe that students in high school should be required to do unpaid work for their community as part of their studies. I agree with this opinion for several reasons.

Firstly, doing community service is very good for the students. When young people help others, for example by working for a charity or teaching sports to children, they learn important skills such as teamwork and communication. They also become more responsible and confident. In addition, this kind of experience looks good on a university or job application, so it can help them in the future.

Secondly, community service is helpful for society. There are many charities and local organisations that need volunteers, and students can give them a lot of support. If the programme is compulsory, all students will take part and not only the ones who are already interested. Some people think that forcing students to volunteer is not a good idea because it is not from the heart. However, I think that even if students do not want to do it at first, they will learn to enjoy it.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school because it helps both the students and society.

Nowadays some people think that unpaid community service should be compulsory in high school. I agree with this idea because it has many benefits for the students and the community.

The first benefit is for the students. When students do community service like helping in a charity or improving their neighbourhood, they learn new skills and they become more responsible. They also get experience which is useful for their future job or university. So community service is good for their personal development.

The second benefit is for the community. Many organisations need help and they don't have enough people. If students do community service, they can help these organisations a lot. Also if it is compulsory, all the students will do it and this is better for the society. Some people say it should not be compulsory, but in my opinion students will understand that it is important.

In conclusion, I agree that unpaid community service should be compulsory in high school because it is good for the students and the community.

Some people think the student in high school must do the community service without payment. I am agree with this opinion.

Community service have many benefit for the students. When they help other people, for example clean the road or teach the sport to small children, they learn many thing and they become good person. Also it is help them to get job in future because the company like the student who have experience.

It is also good for the society. Many charity need the help and the student can do this help. If it is compulsory, all the student will do it, not only some student. So the community will get more benefit. Some people don't like this idea but I think it is not a big problem.

In conclusion, I am agree that the community service should be compulsory in high school because it is good for the student and the society.